Research evaluation has become routine and often relies on metrics. But it is increasingly driven by data and not by expert judgement.
These metrics originally designed to increase the quality of research may be doing the exact opposite....
Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51-61.
Erren, T. C., & Groß, J. V. (2016). Research metrics: What about weighted citations? Scientometrics, 107(1), 315-316. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1841-5
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429.
Jarwal, S. D., Brion, A. M., & King, M. L. (2009). Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’: Blunt instruments or inspired metrics? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4), 289-300. doi: 10.1080/13600800903191930
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2018). The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 474-482. doi: 10.1002/asi.23970
Stephan, P., Veugelers, R., & Wang, J. (2017). Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Nature, 544(7651), 411-412. doi: 10.1038/544411a
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): Science Publishing’s Miscalculating Metric. Academic Questions, 30(4), 433-441. doi: 10.1007/s12129-017-9671-3